W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: proposed response for http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0023.ht ml

From: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 00:44:40 +0100
Message-ID: <16023.21352.70457.957198@excalibur.oaklands.net>
To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org

For what it's worth, I concur with Peter's reply. As you know, I have
always argued for owl:nothing to be in Lite.

Ian

On April 9, Jim Hendler writes:
> 
> Peter - I think this would handle things right, and we could reopen 
> the issue of whether owl:nothing should be in Lite.  I have one small 
> suggestion
> 
> >I believe that the explanatory text adequately makes the distinction
> >between named and anonymous individuals, and that there does not need to be
> >separate productions for them, particularly as the productions are very
> >similar.
> 
> 
> How about citing some of the relevant text and saying
> 
> The following text
>   " ... "
> explains the difference between named and anonymous individuals, 
> There does not need to be separate productions for them as the 
> productions are very similar.
> 
> this way, you can direct him to the particular part of the document 
> that answers his question, rather than making him search for it.
> 
>   -JH
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Professor James Hendler				  hendler@cs.umd.edu
> Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
> Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
> Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  240-731-3822 (Cell)
> http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler
> 
Received on Saturday, 12 April 2003 11:54:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:58 GMT