I wrote: > > In the presence of an rdfs:subPropertyOf chain, the interpretation of the > literal would, I presume, be the disjunction of the conjunctions of the > datatypes indicated by each of the ranges for each rdfs:subPropertyOf i.e. > > foo rdfs:range (Range(foo) union Range(bar)) ... > > foo rdfs:range _:x > _:x owl:unionOf (xsd:[integer union string], xsd:[string union integer]) > No, that can't be correct... it would have to be something like: john foo "10" . => john foo _:x _:x rdf:type xsd:[integer union string] _:x rdf:type xsd:[string union integer] (or rewrite that to conform to the RDF datatypes version de jure , but hopefully you know what I mean :-)) JonathanReceived on Saturday, 28 September 2002 11:50:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:47 UTC