W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > September 2002

Re: LANG: syntactic version for imports (and other things)

From: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:54:25 +0200
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <718937207.1032972865@swpc243.cs.vu.nl>

Bernard Horan wrote:

> If I wish to point a reasoner at
> document 3 to ensure that (say) it has no inconsistencies (in the same
> way that I can point FaCT at an OilEd document), does this mean that I
> have to indicate somewhere that the ontology in document 3 should
> 'import' the ontology in document 2? Should it also 'import' the
> ontology in document 1? Or should it only 'import' the ontology in
> document 1 if that ontology is not imported by the ontology in document
> 2? I.e. what's the transitive character of 'import' here? And how do I,
> as a user, know which ontologies I should be importing??

I have always assumed that when drawing any inferences from any OWL 
statements, you will have to state from which OWL statements you want to draw 
the inferences.

The obvious ways would be to point at a particular <owl:ontology>.
This would then include any imported ontologies, but >*not*< any of the 
ontologies from which classes/properties are used without explicit import 
statement (but simply by mentioning them).

I would expect toolbuilders to provide you with the option to explicitly 
mention that you want these additional ontologies to be taken into account as 
well, but this would require an action on your part, it would not be 
automatic simply because someone uses a URL from another ontology.

Both our semantics doc and our guide doc should make clear that inferences 
are drawn with respect to a given set of premisses, and also how these 
premisses are obtained (by pointing to an ontology (or: several), and thereby 
getting all its imports as well; not by assuming that every relevant resource 
on the web is somehow magically included).

This is also my standard answer to the perenial question about inconsistency 
on the Semantic Web: I won't reason with respect to the entire Web, but only 
with respect to a set of premisses that >*I*< indicate.

Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2002 10:54:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:47 UTC