I am wondering whether to add the flurry of examples we have had on this topic to the test repository under issue 5.3 semantic layering Specifcally "Jeremy's entailment" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0308.html [[[ eg:prop rdfs:range eg:A . eg:A rdfs:subClassOf eg:B . entails eg:prop rdfs:range eg:B . ]]] "Jonathan's example" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0402.html [[ foo rdfs:range bar . foo rdfs:range baz . => foo rdfs:range _:x _:x owl:intersectionOf (bar baz) . ]] "Ian's equivalence" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0381.html 2 entailments (both ways) [[[ P range A could be re-written as: Thing subClassOf Restriction (onProperty P) (allValuesFrom A) ]]] I guess that once we have resolved 5.3 then it will be clear which of these are entailments and which are non-entailments. For now, the descriptions would just link into our e-mail archieve. Any objections to doing so? JeremyReceived on Wednesday, 25 September 2002 06:37:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:52 GMT