Re: possible semantic bugs concerning domain and range

Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>
> > Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> > >
> > > RDFS already allows multiple ranges, just as does OWL, and gives them
> > > intersection semantics, just as does OWL.
> > >
> >
> > Hrmmph ... this seems counterintuitive, I'd assumed that RDFS applied
> > union-of semantics to multiple ranges.
>
> This was changed a long time ago.
>

I see. Well I've just burnt a few vacuum tube in my frontal lobes trying to
figure out if either of these options (conjunctive/disjunctive) are
monotonic, and I'll just give up now and go back to drinking my glass of
wine and thinking about easy stuff like brain surgery...

Jonathan