W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > September 2002

Re: WOWG: agenda Sep 19 telecon

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 18 Sep 2002 12:17:20 -0500
To: "Peter F. "Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1032369441.2991.4113.camel@dirk>

On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 10:38, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
> 
> I am worried that there has been no indication of what should happen in
> preparation for the upcoming F2F.  I haven't seen any information about
> which documents will be considered at F2F4, or which topics will be
> discussed there.
> 
> According to what Dan said
> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2001Nov/0132.html), 
> documents should be *finalized* two weeks before a F2F.

Well, they should be available to everybody by then. They don't have
to be finalized in the sense that everybody has read and
agreed to them. Two weeks before the ftf is 24 Sep.
I'm not aware of any documents that we should be discussing
at the ftf that are unlikely to be available by 24 Sep.


>  I'm willing to
> shave this to a week, but I think that it is necessary to determine which
> documents will be up for consideration, and what topics are going to be
> discussed, with at least two weeks of lead time.
> 
> I consider this an extremely serious problem.  In my view, most of this
> week's telecon has to be devoted to preparation for F2F4.

Assembling the ftf agenda is usually done by the chair offline.
That's happening; I have seen rough drafts. Maybe they should be copied
to the WG mailing list.
But I don't recommend spending telcon time drafting the ftf agenda.


> From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>
> Subject: WOWG: agenda Sep 19 telecon
> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 17:10:01 +0200
[...]

> > 3) ISSUES (45-60 min.)
> 
> [Nothing having to do with F2F4.]

It seems to me that these issues have everything to do with ftf4.
i.e. progress on these issues during telcons tells us which
ones we need to reserve ftf time for.

> > 4) Comments on WDs (10 min, editors)
> 
> [Nothing having to do with F2F4.]

Again, this seems entirely relevant to the ftf.

> > 5) AOB (0-5 min)
> 
> [...]
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2002 13:17:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:52 GMT