> > > > As this dicsussion moves on, I'm becoming more confused. Isn't a > daml:ontology simply a tag that wraps all the statements that are > "in" the > ontology? > No. Conventionally the ontology element is the first child of the rdf element, and the triples in the ontology are shown in other children of the rdf element. e.g. <rdf:RDF> <daml:Ontology rdf:about=""> <daml:version>1.0</daml:version> <daml:Ontology> <daml:Class rdf:ID="Foo" /> <!-- ... --> </rdf:RDF> The "" in the rdf:about refers to the current document. (it is referred to in RFC2396 as a same document reference) Peter's analysis about documents unfortunately makes a lot of sense, and points to a weakness of RDF's triple model that there is no treatment of documents. JeremyReceived on Monday, 16 September 2002 04:51:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:52 GMT