W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > September 2002

Re: Lang: owl:ontolgy (was RE: LANG: syntactic version for imports (and other things))

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:09:34 +0200
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-id: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDIECFCAAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>



Jim, you stole my action ....

that is more or less what I was going to postively propose under:

ACTION: Carroll - send e-mail on what is in an onto.


DAML+OIL seems to assume that we can hack URIs to see that

http://example.org/onto#Potato

is defined in

http://example.org/onto

Having explicit triples that express this relationship (as Jim suggests) is
more flexible and clearer.

Jeremy
Received on Friday, 13 September 2002 07:10:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:52 GMT