W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > September 2002

Re: Lang: owl:ontolgy (was RE: LANG: syntactic version for imports (and other things))

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:09:34 +0200
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org

Jim, you stole my action ....

that is more or less what I was going to postively propose under:

ACTION: Carroll - send e-mail on what is in an onto.

DAML+OIL seems to assume that we can hack URIs to see that


is defined in


Having explicit triples that express this relationship (as Jim suggests) is
more flexible and clearer.

Received on Friday, 13 September 2002 07:10:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:47 UTC