Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > A treatment of imports can be done completely syntactically, by replacing > imports foo, where foo is a URI (or whatever) by the contents of the > document pointed at by foo. This is the way I would handle it in the > abstract syntax and direct semantics. hmmm... if we consider that daml:imports is syntactic sugar for XInclude http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude/ i.e. <xi:include xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" href="foo.daml" /> just using XInclude as it is already specified would allow us to prune this whole discussion and the issues it raises of special syntax, semantics etc. JonathanReceived on Monday, 9 September 2002 20:57:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:52 GMT