W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > September 2002

Re: ISSUE 5.6 - daml:imports as magic syntax

From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 20:40:14 -0400
Message-ID: <010e01c25862$a1c31070$af363418@ne.mediaone.net>
To: <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> A treatment of imports can be done completely syntactically, by replacing
> imports foo, where foo is a URI (or whatever) by the contents of the
> document pointed at by foo.   This is the way I would handle it in the
> abstract syntax and direct semantics.

hmmm... if we consider that daml:imports is syntactic sugar for XInclude
http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude/ i.e.


just using XInclude as it is already specified would allow us to prune this
whole discussion and the issues it raises of special syntax, semantics etc.

Received on Monday, 9 September 2002 20:57:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:47 UTC