W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > September 2002

Re: TEST: Functional and InverseFunctional tests for approval

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 14:05:20 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20020904.140520.08882069.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: jjc@hpl.hp.com
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: TEST: Functional and InverseFunctional tests for approval
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 17:39:18 +0100

[...]

> Peter's does include a minor XML error and should be corrected to say:
> 
> PREMISE
> 
> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
>          xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
>          xmlns:eg="http://www.example.org/">
>     <owl:FunctionalProperty rdf:about="http://www.example.org/prop" />
>     <owl:Thing rdf:about="http://www.example.org/subject">
>       <eg:prop>
> 	  <owl:Thing rdf:about="http://www.example.org/object1" />
>       </eg:prop>
>       <eg:prop>
> 	  <owl:Thing rdf:about="http://www.example.org/object2" />
>       </eg:prop>
>     </owl:Thing>
> </rdf:RDF>

What is the error?  The change that I see is including xmlns:eg and using
eg:prop instead of http://www.example.org/prop.  Is using
http://www.example.org/prop illegal?

[...]

peter
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2002 14:05:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:52 GMT