I would lean towards just not using rdf:ID, but would not be against such stylistic recommendations. peter From: "Smith, Michael K" <michael.smith@eds.com> Subject: RE: Guide: draft of Oct 31 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:19:01 -0600 > > > PS: In general, I think that OWL should completely avoid rdf:ID, instead > > using RDF:about. > > Should the Guide suggest this as good practice? > > - MikeReceived on Thursday, 31 October 2002 17:25:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:35 GMT