Re: on media types for OWL (5.13) from Jonathan Borden on 2002-10-31 (www-webont-wg@w3.org from October 2002)

From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 19:52:54 -0500
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <014e01c28077$d962f580$7c674544@ne.mediaone.net>

>
> Use application/xml to publish a document without
> asserting it, i.e. as an example, test case, illustration,
> object of study, etc.

This would be useful, except that we need rdf:ID to define fragments. Too
bad that RDF Core is out of time for new issues because

application/urdf+xml -- unasserted RDF/XML

would fit the bill perfectly.

Is it worthwhile to define:

application/uowl+xml

? Doesn't seem so.

Jonathan

Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2002 20:12:07 UTC