W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > October 2002

RE: LANG: Proposal to close issue 5.17 - XML syntax

From: Smith, Michael K <michael.smith@eds.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:30:31 -0600
Message-ID: <B8E84F4D9F65D411803500508BE322141187C11F@USPLM207>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>, webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

> Er... we have a normative RDF/XML syntax. That's not
> at issue here.

So, the normative RDF/XML syntax defines the OWL tags?

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Connolly [mailto:connolly@w3.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:33 PM
To: Smith, Michael K
Cc: Jim Hendler; webont
Subject: RE: LANG: Proposal to close issue 5.17 - XML syntax


On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 15:24, Smith, Michael K wrote:
> 
> The one thing I find odd about this is that our documents are using
examples
> that depend on an XML syntax.

Er... we have a normative RDF/XML syntax. That's not
at issue here.

What's at issue here is a non-normative XML presentation
syntax.

>  What mechanism are we going to use to ensure
> document consistency if we leave this for some future time?

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2002 18:30:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:53 GMT