- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:07:21 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
At 8:47 AM -0600 10/29/02, Dan Connolly wrote: >On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 06:42, Jim Hendler wrote: >[...] >> I therefore make the following suggestion, I propose we CLOSE issue >> 4.4 with the following text: >> >> >> Extra-logical features for OWL can currently be expressed using the >> features of RDF and/or RDFS. We see no need to add an additional >> language feature to OWL beyond these. > >Which spec does that text go in? > >Or is it just for the meeting record/issues list? I was assuming meeting record/issues list. > >Is there any impact on the specs for this issue? >Anything you want in the guide? I don't see a need to do anything at this point - if someone has a test case/example they'd like to see in guide, then I'm not averse to seeing it, but it's not clear to me it is necessary at this point. -- Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 240-731-3822 (Cell) http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler
Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2002 10:07:30 UTC