W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: WOWG: Status of non-closed issues

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 29 Oct 2002 08:41:41 -0600
To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Cc: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1035902502.23979.7408.camel@dirk>

On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 07:13, Jim Hendler wrote:
[...]
> ** Issue 5.13 - internet media type for OWL
>   Dan C has provided background document and there has been 
> discussion.  Currently it appears that application/rdf+xml is 
> sufficient, and that creating an application/owl media type would 
> take extra work.  We need a proposal to close this issue.

I don't think so; I gave two proposals. What we need
is either support for one of those proposals or argument
as to why they're insufficient (ala Borden's response
to my first proposal).



> ** Issue 5.19 - Classes as Instances
>   We have resolved these are included in large owl.  Some discussion 
> of whether they are allowed in Owl Lite.  Majority reflected 
> willingness to leave out of OWL Lite, but some dissent.  Someone 
> needs to suggest a specific action, or we should Close this issue 
> with resolution that these are allowed in Large OWL (implying they 
> are not part of Lite).

Yes; in particular, we're expecting something from Frank/Guus:

"ACTION: Frank work with Guus to formulate proposal close
   classes-as-instances incl lite/fast/large
Postponed to next telecon (Frank on holiday)
ACTION CONTINUED."
	-- minutes 24Oct
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Oct/0198.html

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2002 09:41:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:53 GMT