On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 07:13, Jim Hendler wrote: [...] > ** Issue 5.13 - internet media type for OWL > Dan C has provided background document and there has been > discussion. Currently it appears that application/rdf+xml is > sufficient, and that creating an application/owl media type would > take extra work. We need a proposal to close this issue. I don't think so; I gave two proposals. What we need is either support for one of those proposals or argument as to why they're insufficient (ala Borden's response to my first proposal). > ** Issue 5.19 - Classes as Instances > We have resolved these are included in large owl. Some discussion > of whether they are allowed in Owl Lite. Majority reflected > willingness to leave out of OWL Lite, but some dissent. Someone > needs to suggest a specific action, or we should Close this issue > with resolution that these are allowed in Large OWL (implying they > are not part of Lite). Yes; in particular, we're expecting something from Frank/Guus: "ACTION: Frank work with Guus to formulate proposal close classes-as-instances incl lite/fast/large Postponed to next telecon (Frank on holiday) ACTION CONTINUED." -- minutes 24Oct http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Oct/0198.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2002 09:41:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:53 GMT