Re: SEM: 5.5 List semantics

I PROPOSE that OWL augment the characterization of the RDF List vocabulary
so that it serves the needed purpose for OWL.   The technical details for
this augmentation can be found in

  http://www-db.research.bell-labs.com/user/pfps/owl/rdfs.html

I PROPOSE that there be no owl:List, owl:first, owl:rest, or owl:nil.

I maintain that this sort of augmentation is entirely in keeping the
entirely of the RDF(S) philosophy.

Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Bell Labs Research