W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > October 2002

status of LBase

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:43:04 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20021018.144304.130341445.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: phayes@ai.uwf.edu
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Subject: Re: SEM: Reaching consensus (was Re: third version of semantics document)
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 01:53:26 -0700


> As a proponent for Lbase, let me say that the idea isn't really to 
> provide an alternative semantics, so much as an alternative way of 
> presenting the same semantics. That is, the idea would be to use 
> Lbase as a kind of common semantic framework. One should be able to 
> read off a model theory from the Lbase translation. 


What is the status of LBase?  It was going to be a W3C note, I thought.

Also, is there a mapping from any semantic web language (RDF, RDFS, OWL
Lite, abstract OWL, Fast OWL, Large OWL) into LBase?  I would think that
it would be a good idea to have at least one such mapping before LBase gets
to be a W3C note.

Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Bell Labs Research
Received on Friday, 18 October 2002 14:43:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:48 UTC