Re: shorthand notation for OWL Lite constraints

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> Date: 11 Oct 2002 08:16:29 -0500 To: Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com> Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org Message-Id: <1034342189.27708.11.camel@dirk> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:53 GMT

On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 09:06, Christopher Welty wrote:
[...]
> With the shorthand notation described above, one could say instead:
> 
> <owl:class rdf:ID=SoccerTeam>
>   <rdfs:subClassOf>
>    <owl:hasExactlyOne rdf:resource="goalie"/>
>   </rdfs:subClassOf>
> </owl:class>

Actually, just:

<owl:Class rdf:ID="SoccerTeam">
  <owl:hasExactlyOne rdf:resource="#goalie"/>
</owl:Class>

or, in triple form:

	ex:SoccerTeam owl:hasExactlyOne ex:goalie.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/