- From: Raphael Volz <volz@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 23:32:11 +0200
- To: "Webont" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Minutes of WebOnt telecon September 26, 2002 Participants: The Agenda is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0449.html 1) Roll Call Everyone was present except for those excused: Dale, Klein, Sabbouh, ter Hosrt, van Harmelen The latter joined in later. 2) Last Minutes Minutes of last telcon accepted They can be found at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0396.html 3) Next telecon - no telecon on Oct 3 - next telecon will be Oct 10 - scribe solicited for Oct 10 LynnT will scribe if Massimo is not available Final agenda will be disputed tomorrow. Please comment on Bristol ftf4 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0316.html Ftf version of documents should be avaialbe by Fri 27 Sep noon EST. Current versions: Ftf version of documents should be avaialbe by Fri 27 Sep noon EST. People think that they'll make it. People should email, whether they cannot make it to one of the proposed dates for probable FTF in Boston 4) Upcoming ftf meetings Bristol logistics (Jeremy): http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/jjc/webont/webontOct.html Bristol networking: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0412.html Bristol ftf4 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0316.html Network constraints. No IRC over wireless 2) ACTION review: (10 min) ACTION: Jeff Heflin - produce a test case/use case for versioning feature and send it to the list. --> Done ACTION: Pat Hayes - update embedded semantics document and provide an appendix to point out the position that the semantics takes on Issues. --> Done ACTION: Authors of Working Drafts - summarize document changes to WOWG list. à Done ACTION: Carroll - update WG on networking for f2f-> Done 3) Comments on WDs (15 min, editors) Summary of comments on feature synopsis: feature set still under dispute (some people want things off, other things on) Summary of comments on asbtract syntax: Primarily wording... FvH thinks that we don't have enough comment, need more visibility 4) ISSUES (45-60 min.) 4.1 ISSUE 5.6 & 5.14 (Heflin) http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#I5.6-daml:imports-as-mag ic-syntax http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#I5.14-Ontology-versionin g Heflin's message on proposal to move forward: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0378.html - status of debate: main options/decision points - actions for amended/new resolutions one opinion is that we should not do anyting that requires new parsers Jim says, that rdf:RDF may not be required in theory but pratice etablishes it as a standard multiple rdf:RDF is not defined, depends on parser behaviour jim proposes to take identifier for import out of possible domain of resources, which can be subject of OWL statements ACTION JEFF: Update semantic layering directions doc in prep of FTF discussion 4.2 ISSUE 5.3 Semantic layering (Hayes, Patel-Schneider) http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#I5.3-Semantic-Layering Last version of "Semantic latering" document http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0352.html Hayes' message on status of the debate c.q. possible resolutions http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0408.html - Q&A/discussion on Weak/Large/Fast OWL - Q&A/discussion on Weak/Large/Fast OWL - impact on ISSUE 5.1: Uniform treatment of literal/data values - impact on ISSUE 5.19: Classes as instances - straw polls on possible resolutions ... can we even stop having email `?
Received on Friday, 4 October 2002 17:34:09 UTC