W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > October 2002

RE: WOWG: test document for review

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:52:38 +0100
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <ENEKKODIOPDFKPGAOLNIIEANCAAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>


Thanks for the feedback Dan,
I'll do more justice tomorrow.

> Case in point, test 003:
>
>   If prop is an owl:FunctionalProperty, then its inverse
>   is an owl:InverseFunctionalProperty.
>
> which part of what spec supports that inference?
>
>

Yeah, that's only "PROPOSED" not approved ...(unless I screwed up)

My take was that both of Pat's proposals and Peter's proposal has that as
true. Although the text could be improved. e.g. "its inverse, if any,"

Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2002 12:49:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:53 GMT