W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > October 2002

RE: when consensus competes with a schedule: formal objections

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:07:37 +0100
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

Attn: Patel-Schneider
> [[
> VOTE. A vote was taken on whether or not to approve the OWL test cases
> as described in jjc's email.  The vote passed with one opposed (pfps),
> one abstention (ChrisW) and the rest positive.
> ]]
>  -- 29Aug minutes
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0059.html
> I expect the WG to work that one out too. But Peter,
> you have the right to include a formal objection
> if we don't eventually work things out to your satisfaction.


I have worked at understanding your objections, and hope that they have now
been addressed by, the test doc for review (assuming that it is acceptable
to the WG) - vis:
- the descriptions of those tests
- and the process

Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2002 04:04:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:48 UTC