RE: proposal to close Issue 5.8 Datatypes

> > Exclude xsd:QName, xsd:ENTITY, xsd:NOTATION
> >
>
> Hmm.  This appears to mean that some XML Schema types do not have a
> well-defined context-independent lexical-to-value mapping!  I agree that
> such types cannot be handled under the RDF datatyping proposal.


For the record, we (Peter and I) seem to be agreeing on:

the XML Schema built-in types except for:

xsd:QName, xsd:ENTITY, xsd:NOTATION, xsd:ENTITIES, xsd:IDREFS, xsd:NMTOKENS

with that amendment I can support Peter's proposal. I would like telecon
time on the the URIs for user defined types issuette.

Jeremy