W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: MT for imports (was: Re: Imports Proposal)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 13 Nov 2002 11:26:08 -0600
To: dlm@ksl.Stanford.EDU
Cc: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>, Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1037208368.11279.21741.camel@dirk>

On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 11:08, dlm@ksl.Stanford.EDU wrote:
[...]
> So this message has two points:
> -  to reinforce the notion that cyclic imports will occur routinely.

agreed...

> - scaffolding systems allowing importing of ontologies have been available and in use for years.
> (some/many? of those such as ontolingua have been updated to support daml+oil imports). 

Ontolingua does daml+oil imports? Is that something I can play with?
pointer to source code, installation instructions, web forms
to play with, whatever?

Do you have examples/test cases?

> We do not need more scaffolding built tin order to obtain usage data.

I trust you're speaking for yourself; I am not yet convinced.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2002 12:26:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:55 GMT