W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > November 2002

RE: LANG: need to CLOSE Issue 5.6 Imports as magic syntax

From: Jerome Euzenat <Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:54:42 +0100
Message-Id: <a05111b0bb9f04b3264bd@[194.199.20.189]>
To: "Massimo Marchiori" <massimo@w3.org>
Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

Again,

Now to consider the point made by Massimo:

At 15:07 +0100 07/11/2002, Massimo Marchiori wrote:
>1) [major] when transporting/manipulating RDF, you risk to lose the 
>import information.

This can occur if you consider that once you've imported the 
definition of someURI#Foo, you are entitled to call it "Foo" in your 
RDF/OWL. Is this the issue?

Would someone be opposed to have an "import" construct + the 
obligation to keep the someURI# ? This should solve this problem at 
least. Import would just mark the endorsement of the imported content.


-- 
  Jérôme Euzenat                  __
                                  /      /\
  INRIA Rhône-Alpes,            _/  _   _   _ _    _
                               /_) | ` / ) | \ \  /_)
  655, avenue de l'Europe,    (___/___(_/_/  / /_(_________________
  Montbonnot St Martin,       /        http://www.inrialpes.fr/exmo
  38334 Saint-Ismier cedex,  /          Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr
  France____________________/                Jerome.Euzenat@free.fr
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2002 11:55:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:55 GMT