- From: Jerome Euzenat <Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr>
- Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:54:42 +0100
- To: "Massimo Marchiori" <massimo@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Again,
Now to consider the point made by Massimo:
At 15:07 +0100 07/11/2002, Massimo Marchiori wrote:
>1) [major] when transporting/manipulating RDF, you risk to lose the
>import information.
This can occur if you consider that once you've imported the
definition of someURI#Foo, you are entitled to call it "Foo" in your
RDF/OWL. Is this the issue?
Would someone be opposed to have an "import" construct + the
obligation to keep the someURI# ? This should solve this problem at
least. Import would just mark the endorsement of the imported content.
--
Jérôme Euzenat __
/ /\
INRIA Rhône-Alpes, _/ _ _ _ _ _
/_) | ` / ) | \ \ /_)
655, avenue de l'Europe, (___/___(_/_/ / /_(_________________
Montbonnot St Martin, / http://www.inrialpes.fr/exmo
38334 Saint-Ismier cedex, / Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr
France____________________/ Jerome.Euzenat@free.fr
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2002 11:55:09 UTC