Re: TEST: scope

[...]

> > This is using an RDF/N3 presentation syntax
> > but the RDF/XML resources are there as well
> > (I hope with not too many bugs, as I
> > had to do the RDF list stuff by hand
> > instead of using CWM's N3-to-RDF)
>
> Now wait just a minute here.  Are you actually suggesting that OWL tests
> use N3 or log:entails?  If so, I protest in the strongest terms.  I am
> *not* willing to have any OWL tests be written in a system that has 
neither
> syntax nor semantics, like N3.  Neither am i willing to have any OWL 
tests
> written using connectives that do not have a semantics, like 
log:entails.

P log:entails C means that P U ~C is unsatisfiable
P is designated as a list of RDF graph URI's
  and namespace entailment URI's
C is designated as a single RDF graph URI

N3 syntax is used for those designations
IS ALL

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/