W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > June 2002

Re: OWL Document list (was Re: proposal for last session of July face-to-face)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 18:27:26 -0400
To: hendler@cs.umd.edu
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20020619182726J.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Subject: OWL Document list (was Re: proposal for last session of July face-to-face)
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 17:41:03 -0400

> At 10:05 AM -0400 6/19/02, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

[...]

> >My proposal is that this session should be mostly devoted to planning with
> >respect to finishing the definition of OWL.  The documents currently being
> >developed in the working group do not form a complete definition of OWL and
> >the missing sections need to be filled in very soon.
> >
> >I am thus providing a proposal for filling in these missing sections. 

[...]

> Not to comment on the above, but I think you leave a few things out 
> in the "completion" of OWL - let's not forget
>   1) Required*: Guide and walkthru documents
>   2) Required*: Test cases and implementations (needed for Last Call)
>   3) Optional**: Any other non-normative syntaxes other people wish to publish
>   4) Optional***: Axiomatic Semantics (in KIF or other format)
> 
> *: min-cardinality = 1
> **: no cardinality specification
> ***: max-cardinality = 1
> 
> 
> -- 
> Professor James Hendler				  hendler@cs.umd.edu

Not to comment on the desirability of completing the work needed to get to
Rec status, but are any of these needed to ```[finish] the definition of
OWL''?   Besides, both GUIDE and TEST have sessions devoted to them in the
F2F.


peter
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2002 18:27:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:50 GMT