W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > June 2002

Issue 4.1 UniqueProperty is a bad name

From: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 19:31:30 +0200
Message-ID: <3CFF9C72.6B2B2E9@cs.vu.nl>
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org



I propose to close this issue by renaming this language element
as HasOnlyOne,
as first proposed by Pat Hayes in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Apr/0146.html:

"This will allow expressions like HasOnlyOne Father"

Frank.
   ----

Received on Thursday, 6 June 2002 13:32:07 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Frank van Harmelen: "ISSUE 3.4: daml:UnambigousProperty"
Previous message: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: 5.11 hasClass/toClass names"
Next in thread: Dan Connolly: "Re: Issue 4.1 UniqueProperty is a bad name"
Reply: Dan Connolly: "Re: Issue 4.1 UniqueProperty is a bad name"
Reply: Mike Dean: "Re: Issue 4.1 UniqueProperty is a bad name"
Maybe reply: Jos De_Roo: "Re: Issue 4.1 UniqueProperty is a bad name"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:50 GMT