Re: 5.11 hasClass/toClass names

On May 31, Jeff Heflin writes:
> 
> Possible candidates for names include:
> 
> hasClass -> someValuesFrom
> toClass -> allValuesFrom

Jeff,

I like these suggestions - they are the best I have seen so far.

Can you now please turn your attention to unambiguous and
uniquelyIdentifying :-)

Ian

> 
> Another alternative is:
> 
> hasClass -> required (as in current Feature Synopsis by Peter et al.)
> toClass -> localRange
> 
> Jeff