W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > June 2002

Re: Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty (fwd)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 08:32:19 -0400
To: danbri@w3.org
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20020606083219N.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty (fwd)
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 08:02:13 -0400 (EDT)

> 
> 
> Re motivating daml:UnambiguousProperty, here are some public but offlist
> notes I made a little while ago, and which Libby just mentioned.
> 
> Dan
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 09:34:19 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
> To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
> Cc: connolly@w3.org, massimo@w3.org, www-archive@w3.org,
>      libby.miller@bris.ac.uk, Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>
> Subject: Re: Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty
> Resent-Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 09:35:05 -0400 (EDT)
> Resent-From: www-archive@w3.org
> 
> 
> 
> Oops, Guus and Libby's addresses were missing from CC list; resending.
> 
> imho UnambiguousProperty is the most important thing for WebOnt to get
> riht, and since there are some subtleties (eg. unambiguity of a property
> over time) 

I am totally confused as to why you would think that WebOnt is concerned
with time.  Could you please let me know why you think that WebOnt should
be concerned with the time-varying behaviour of properties?

> is is important for WebOnt to write down the reason it has
> this construct. Below is a draft that might be useful for this.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Dan

[...]

Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Received on Thursday, 6 June 2002 08:32:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:50 GMT