W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > June 2002

Antwort: Re: WOWG ADMIN IMPORTANT: Issue list: cleanup of ISSUES 2.1-3.4

From: <ruediger.klein@daimlerchrysler.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:54:32 +0200
To: <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0057440017364402000002L422*@MHS>

Hallo Ian:

from a applicational point of view both enumerated classes (one-of) AND inverse 
are very necessary (not to say indispensible!)

If both features together makes reasoning much more complicated - I don't know 
what to do.

Can we find a way which allows the user to use both features which will (in a 
normal case or so) NOT result in reasoning complications?
For instance, in many cases inverse relations will be used only as a kind of 
syntactic sugar (no additional semantic provided in comparison to the original 
relation). But can users not familiar with DL understand such aspects of 


Received on Thursday, 6 June 2002 05:55:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:44 UTC