W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > July 2002

Re: new issue? should OWL provide synonyms for RDF and RDFS objects

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 13:23:23 +0200
To: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF4E42C03D.E0108C8F-ONC1256C03.003E6822@agfa.be>

> I find the OWL synonyms quite useful. It eases the burden of users on
> keeping straight which names come from where.

well, rdfs:subPropertyOf comes from
<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> no?

> It's just plain silly that
> Property is the rdf namespace but Class is in the rdfs namespace.

maybe silly, but still OK

[...]

I don't need that kind of synonyms

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Saturday, 27 July 2002 07:24:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:51 GMT