W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > July 2002

Re: issue 5.10: a position statement (sameState over peopleKey)

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 23:18:57 +0200
To: "Dan Connolly <connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: "Peter F. "Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF3C80C607.8A620629-ONC1256BFA.00746BDE@agfa.be>

[ true ]

> On the basis of my experience as a user and an implementor,
> I prefer that our spec justifies the sameState entailment, and

right, we succeeded with that one

> it's acceptable to me if it doesn't justify the peopleKey entailment.
> This does not support the "detecting inconsistency" goal, but as
> far as I can tell, it doesn't contradict any of our agreed requirements.

I'm quite confident that that one could work as well
(with math:proofCount and some such)

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 17:19:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:46 UTC