W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > July 2002

Re: ISSUE: enumeration classes (2.4)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 18 Jul 2002 14:53:52 -0500
To: "Peter F. "Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: ruediger.klein@daimlerchrysler.com, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1027022033.27663.380.camel@dirk>

On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 14:16, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: ISSUE: enumeration classes (2.4)
> Date: 18 Jul 2002 14:09:59 -0500
> 
> [...]
> 
> > On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 11:00, ruediger.klein@daimlerchrysler.com wrote:
> > > 
> > > is there a chance to have enumeration classes already in OWL lite?
> 
> 								 ^^^^^^
> > yes, there's a chance; in fact, they're in DAML+OIL, so unless
> > we decide to remove them, we will have them.
> 
> I think that you may be missing the impact of the ``lite'', above.

oops; quite.

> [...]

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 15:53:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:51 GMT