> The reference description is also missing entries for > owl:List > owl:first > owl:rest > owl:nil > in the list of language elements. > > As well, the expansion of the collection should use owl: for these > resources. A while ago RDFCore proposed those to be rdf:List rdf:first rdf:rest rdf:nil where @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . That was in message http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Jun/0003.html -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/Received on Monday, 15 July 2002 19:01:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:51 GMT