Re: OWL Reference Description for F2F 3

> The reference description is also missing entries for
>     owl:List
>     owl:first
>     owl:rest
>     owl:nil
> in the list of language elements.
>
> As well, the expansion of the collection should use owl: for these
> resources.

A while ago RDFCore proposed those to be
    rdf:List
    rdf:first
    rdf:rest
    rdf:nil
where @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
That was in message
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Jun/0003.html

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

Received on Monday, 15 July 2002 19:01:46 UTC