W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > January 2002

Re: evaluating DAML+OIL vs. WebOnt requirements

From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 12:37:31 +0100
To: mdean@bbn.com
Cc: connolly@w3.org, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <OFCB0497A6.9D9C9252-ONC1256B51.003F7DE6@bayer-ag.com>


> 1) Extending your recipe for strings, can't one express
> unique URI naming of objects using
>
>   :uniqueName
>     a daml:UnambiguousProperty;  # each uniqueName denotes 1 object
>     a daml:UniqueProperty.       # each object has only 1 uniqueName

nice
(just to not forget it (Dan),
N3's ... is ... of ... is maybe only making sense
for for such biunique functions)

--
Jos
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2002 06:37:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:47 GMT