W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > January 2002

RE: defaults

From: Tim Finin <finin@cs.umbc.edu>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:44:39 -0500
To: "'Peter F. Patel-Schneider'" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001c1a36c$773d3520$a5635582@cs.umbc.edu>

> From: www-webont-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-webont-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Peter F.
Patel-Schneider
> ...
> My memory may be failing, but I don't remember any support  for
defaults in
> any version of Classic.  It would be possible to achieve some of the
effect
> of defaults by using procedural attachment in Classic, but that would
> violate the procedural attachment contract, unless all that 
> was done was a kind of input completion.

I must have been thinking about the use of procedural attachment in
Classic.  
What was the procedural attachment contract in Classic?  I'm guessing
that
Any conclusions had to be monotonic.
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2002 12:42:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:47 GMT