Re: REQDOC: Changes from last version

Deborah McGuinness wrote:
> 
> Jeff Heflin wrote:
> 
> > Since we had agreed to freeze the document as of Monday night, I am
> > hesitant to make any changes until after the telecon. However, we seem
> > to have arrived at a consensus on the issue, so I imagine the group will
> > not mind if this change is made after the group decides on the
> > document's status at the telecon. The editors take on the following
> > action:
> >
> > ACTION: Change the wording of the "Ability to state closed worlds"
> > requirement to Frank's wording. We will also leave it as an objective
> >
> 
> I presume you are also including the update that I suggested which included the
> example of closing off information on an individual.
> 

Correct.