At 4:33 PM -0600 2/26/02, Dan Connolly wrote: >On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 10:09, Jeff Heflin wrote: >[...] >> 6) "Integration of digital signatures" - Dan Connolly had volunteered to >> provide alternate wording. > >Crud... sorry... in case this is still helpful: > > The W3C XML Digital Signature specification is > an important building block for communication among > untrusted parties, which is important for many > ontology applications [, for example, ...?]. > It should be straightforward to use XML Signatures > with OWL. > all of the use cases need digital sigs, but the agents and ubiq computing probably the most of all of the ones in the current use cases, so I think if we just left out the missing "for example" from this and included those two as the motivators, this would be a good change -JH -- Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) AV Williams Building, Univ of Maryland College Park, MD 20742 http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendlerReceived on Tuesday, 26 February 2002 18:37:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:48 GMT