i second the demotion to objective. i would expect that we can come up with a close world plan that works (if by no other means than what we used in some dl configuration applications at att) but i would want to leave the option of that being in release 2 rather than release 1. d Frank van Harmelen wrote: > Jeff Heflin wrote: > > > - Ability to state closed worlds: demoted to an Objective (I didn't > > receive Frank's new wording until after I had already published the > > document. Should I add this before Thursday?) > > Apologies for sending in late. I suggest to include my new wording (plus the > addition by Deb), >*and*< to demote it to an Objective (requested by some, > objected to by none). > > Frank. > ---- -- Deborah L. McGuinness Knowledge Systems Laboratory Gates Computer Science Building, 2A Room 241 Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9020 email: dlm@ksl.stanford.edu URL: http://ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/index.html (voice) 650 723 9770 (stanford fax) 650 725 5850 (computer fax) 801 705 0941Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2002 17:19:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:28 GMT