W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: UPDATE: why RDF syntax is not suitable for OWL

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 13 Feb 2002 22:44:12 -0600
To: "Peter F. "Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1013661853.19333.2.camel@dirk>
On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 17:56, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
[...]
> 		Why Triples are Terrible for Syntax
[...the suspence builds...]
> None of the above problems are really solvable using RDF triples.  A much
> better syntax carrier would allow syntax to be represented as tuples or,
> even better, as trees.

Bummer. I was all set to say "yes, that's a much better alternative!"

But I don't see an alternative.

Oh well... there's always tomorrow...

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 23:43:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:47 GMT