Re: review of Reference, Guide, and Features

Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote (concerning Features)
> I think that the information in this document should be folded into
> Reference, which would then be a complete informal reference document for
> the sublanguages of OWL.  I think that this can be done by adding two
> sections to Reference, one for OWL DL and one for OWL Lite.  If this is not
> deemed to be adequate, then the section in Guide about the sublanguages
> could also be expanded.

I support this proposal.
(I also support many, many of Peter's other less dramatic comments)

Jeremy