Based on the discussions on appending the closing of Issue 5.13 [1] during our December 18 telecon [2], I propose that we replace owl:Ontology with the following definitions: <rdfs:Class rdf:ID="FullOntology"> <rdfs:label>FullOntology</rdfs:label> <rdfs:comment>an OWL Full ontology</rdfs:comment> </rdfs:Class> <rdfs:Class rdf:ID="DLOntology"> <rdfs:label>DLOntology</rdfs:label> <rdfs:comment>an OWL DL ontology</rdfs:comment> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#FullOntology"/> </rdfs:Class> <rdfs:Class rdf:ID="LiteOntology"> <rdfs:label>LiteOntology</rdfs:label> <rdfs:comment>an OWL Lite ontology</rdfs:comment> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#DLOntology"/> </rdfs:Class> I'd also like to suggest that we add owl:Document as a superclass of owl:FullOntology, for associating versioning and other information with instances. Mike [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Dec/0224.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Dec/0272.htmlReceived on Monday, 30 December 2002 11:58:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:04:56 GMT