W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > December 2002

Re: ADMIN: Minutes Dec 12

From: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:49:21 -0500
Message-ID: <3E01EA81.6F80D131@cse.lehigh.edu>
To: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
CC: www-webont-wg@w3.org


I think we can change from backCompatibleWith to backwardCompatibleWith
without discussion.

As for versionInfo, I still believe that the new versioning properties
make it obsolete. You say that using your own property isn't general
enough, but what makes you think other people will use versionInfo in a
way that allows you to get "cheap provenance" information. If anything,
it seems that using the property in this way will give unituitive
results for your applications when used with ontologies created by other


Mike Dean wrote:
> > ISSUE 5.14 Versioning Closed Dec. 05
> > closing text at:
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Dec/0075.html
> > (Versioning needs to go into the reference and maybe Guide documents)
> > (Issues List also needs to reflect this change -EKW as scribe)
> We never got to a discussion of versionInfo (important to
> me) and backwardCompatibleWith (less so), as raised in [1]
> and [2].
>         Mike
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Dec/0079.html
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Dec/0163.html
Received on Thursday, 19 December 2002 10:50:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:56 GMT