Re: owl:Ontology in abstract syntax

From: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: owl:Ontology in abstract syntax
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:07:23 +0100

> 
> >I'm going to remove the subClass triple that causes this problem, along
> >with a number of other subClass, domain, and range triples.  They are all
> >entailed by the OWL model theory anyway.
> 
> 
> Can you indicate which ones -
> it makes a lot of difference to the test cases.
> 
> Jeremy


Here is the modified translation.

peter