Re: editorial tweak to OWL semantics doc

Hmm.

Why shouldn't that go at the beginning of the RDFS-Compatible
Model-Theoretic Semantics section?  It appears to me that OWL/DL, when
written in N-triples, is also an RDF semantic extension.

Also, I'm confused as to the distinction between a collection of N-triples
and an RDF graph.  It appears to me that the former is better specified
than the latter and thus should be used in preference to it.

peter



From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Subject: editorial tweak to OWL semantics doc
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 11:35:01 -0600

> 
> Peter, could you somewhere add a sentence to the effect that 
> OWL/RDF-full is an RDF semantic extension, with a link to 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#DefSemanticExtension
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Pat
> 
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
> 40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola               			(850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32501            				(850)291 0667    cell
> phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
> s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam