W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > December 2002

Re: Review comments on OWL Semantics

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 08:48:48 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20021216.084848.02924952.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: herman.ter.horst@philips.com
Cc: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, www-webont-wg@w3.org

How about?

	I'll change when the RDF/XML Syntax Specification and the RDF
	Semantics documents change.

as they both use N-triples, in preference to the RDF graph and in normative
sections.


peter




From: herman.ter.horst@philips.com
Subject: Re: Review comments on OWL Semantics
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:47:28 +0100

> Jeremy Carroll writes:
> 
> > N-triples
> > =========
> > I would strongly prefer that the mapping to RDF be expressed as a 
> mapping 
> > to the RDF abstract syntax (a graph) not to the non-preferred N-triples 
> syntax.
> 
> I support this.  I made a remark to the same effect in my (partial) review 
> of
> the OWL semantics document at
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Nov/0043.html
> 
> 
> Herman ter Horst
Received on Monday, 16 December 2002 08:49:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:55 GMT