My understanding of the abstract syntax is that the following RDF Graph is not part of OWL DL. <a> <b> _:v . <a> <c> _:v . _:v <d> <e> . i.e. the use of blank nodes in OWL DL is approximately that permitted in RDF M&S without the new rdf:nodeID construct. I think this is a mistake. RDF Core found that the inability to serialize an arbitrary graph in the official syntax was somewhat embarrassing, I think WebOnt should learn from that embarrassment. Suggested fix, permit individualID,and perhaps classID to be a blank node identifier in abstract syntax. JeremyReceived on Wednesday, 11 December 2002 14:00:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:55 GMT