I would appreciate a small slot on the agenda for a formal vote on "OWL Lite semantics is OWL DL semantics restricted to the OWL Lite syntax" or somesuch, which appears to be the WG consensus. This is mainly because I would like to register my opposition to that decision. I suspect that the e-mail discussion has sufficed, with the timescale argument having proved compelling to the more neutral members of the group. PS: sorry about the minutes, I will try to do a better job of them now. JeremyReceived on Wednesday, 11 December 2002 13:05:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:55 GMT