W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > December 2002

RE: OWL Lite semantics

From: Marwan Sabbouh <ms@mitre.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 10:24:16 -0500
To: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>, <www-webont-wg-request@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BCECKAKMDIPLLELLLPIKIEGGCAAA.ms@mitre.org>

>I also very much like Pat's observation that
 > Two incomplete systems can interoperate. In fact,
 > they may be able to help one another by each one
 > handling some inference that the other cannot.

me too.

marwan

-----Original Message-----
From: www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
[mailto:www-webont-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jos De_Roo
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 8:47 PM
To: Jim Hendler <hendler
Cc: Deborah McGuinness; Peter F. Patel-Schneider; pat hayes;
www-webont-wg@w3.org; www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
Subject: Re: OWL Lite semantics




[...]

> 4 - Jeremy's proposal for a different semantic restriction for Owl
> Lite does not contradict any explicit decisions made by the WG as far
> as I can tell - thus, please focus any discussion of the
> ramifications of what he proposes on what he proposes, not on general
> discussion and flaming that adds nothing to that discussion.

agreed and taking
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Dec/0087.html
there should be no problem

I also very much like Pat's observation that
  Two incomplete systems can interoperate. In fact,
  they may be able to help one another by each one
  handling some inference that the other cannot.

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2002 10:28:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:55 GMT