W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > December 2002

Re: SEM: rdfs:subPropertyOf cases

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 16:17:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20021208.161721.113719752.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org

From: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Subject: SEM: rdfs:subPropertyOf cases
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 01:17:05 +0100

> 
> I gathered that
> 
> owl:allDifferent rdfs:subPropertyOf owl:oneOf .

I don't see where this would come from.

> owl:backCompatWith rdfs:subPropertyOf owl:priorVersion .

I don't think that this is necessarily the case.

> owl:imports rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:seeAlso .

This is not the way I would think of this.

> owl:sameClassAs rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:subClassOf .
> owl:samePropertyAs rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:subPropertyOf .

These appear to be truths to me, but they are only derivable in Full OWL.

> owl:versionInfo rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:comment .

I can't image why anyone would want this.

> and wonder if that's OK and wether there are other cases?
> 
> -- ,
> Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

peter
Received on Sunday, 8 December 2002 16:17:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:55 GMT